Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20030130094221.01a38348@mail.earthlink.net>
X-Sender: rwcitek AT mail DOT earthlink DOT net
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:42:21 -0600
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Robert Citek <rwcitek AT alum DOT calberkeley DOT org>
Subject: /proc in Cygwin - Awesome ( was RE: No more /proc/registry ...
  )
In-Reply-To: <269620-220031430151426848@M2W091.mail2web.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


I am running an older version of Cygwin (1.3.14).  Both 'cd /proc/registry'
and 'ls /proc/registry' work just fine.  In fact, 'cd /proc' works just
fine, too.

Until this thread started, I was not even aware that /proc existed under
Cygwin.  I cannot find any mention of it in the User Guide or the FAQ (used
grep).  Regardelss, this is a way-cool feature.

Thanks to all invovled for creating /proc in Cygwin.

Regards,
- Robert

-----

At 10:14 AM 1/30/2003 -0500, lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com wrote:
>Sorry, I'm running a snapshot version of 1.3.20 here (1/21/2003) but 
>your procedure below works fine for me.  Perhaps you want to try a 
>snapshot or a previous version of cygwin1.dll to see if that makes
>your problem better or worse.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/