Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <3E371928.1020004@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:58:32 -0500
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Peter A. Castro" <doctor AT fruitbat DOT org>
CC: "William A. Hoffman" <billlist AT nycap DOT rr DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: tclsh83.exe should be cygtclsh83.exe
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0301272242090 DOT 942-100000 AT gremlin DOT fruitbat DOT org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Peter A. Castro wrote:

>>If that is NOT what you are suggestion -- e.g. that only tclsh83 should 
>>be renamed -- why?  Why is tclsh83 special?
> 
> 
> By that same token, why do the tcl libraries have "cyg" in their name?
> Eg: libtcl83.a is named libcygtcl83.a.  Why?  It's still tcl.  Why are the
> libraries name different for this platform?  I've had to hack some
> autoconf generated configure scripts because they wanted 'libtcl83' not
> 'libcygtcl83'.

I know.  In general, import and static libs are "libfoo", but the DLLs 
are cygfoo.  This is to avoid hard-to-diagnose problems related to DLL 
loading, platform mismatch, and in-memory caching.  (similar to .exe 
conflicts -- but much harder to diagnose, since DLL loading is a black 
art for most users, while "make sure the .exe you want is in front of 
your PATH" is fairly easy)

As far as the libraries for tcl, I dunno.  That's a decision made by the 
tcl/tk folks over on the insight list.  For the record, I have these in 
my /usr/lib dir:
/usr/lib/libcygitcl32.a
/usr/lib/libcygtcl83.a
/usr/lib/libtcl8.3.a  <<<<<<<----------
/usr/lib/libcygitclstub32.a
/usr/lib/libcygtclstub83.a
/usr/lib/tclConfig.sh

But I haven't yet updated to the version that was released today. 
Apparently a lot of hard work has gone on in this area recently; take a 
look at the new packages.  If they aren't satisfactory, I'm sure the 
folks over on the insight list would love some help -- but don't hold 
your breath on the tcl executable being renamed...

>>P.S.  Now, we *do* name all DLL's with a special 'cyg' prefix, but that 
>>is because DLLs are a much more complicated problem than EXEs (memory 
>>resident, etc etc)
> 
> 
> For DLLs, I can see why they are tagged with 'cyg' (this *is* still
> Windows under the hood), but what about static linklibs? 

That is controlled by the compiler/linker's lookup path (builtin, plus 
-L arguments).  Thus, no need to worry about conflicts unless you do 
something silly.  And linktime issues are the domain of developers, who 
are assumed to be somewhat more clueful than your average bear.

--Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/