Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:35:49 -0800
From: Mo DeJong <mdejong AT uncounted DOT org>
Subject: Re: [sourcenav-user] Snapshot: Redhat's Source Navigator version 5.2.0
 native Win32 build
In-reply-to: <3E35A1D8.3020506@yahoo.com>
To: mingw-users AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net
Cc: sourcenav-user AT lists DOT sourceforge DOT net, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <20030127153549.31df0b53.mdejong@uncounted.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <3E35A1D8 DOT 3020506 AT yahoo DOT com>

On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:17:12 -0500
Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com> wrote:

> I've just uploaded a release of Redhat's Source Navigator now maintained 
> at http://sourcenav.sf.net to the MinGW project.

I have to admit that I am a bit conflicted about this action Earnie.
While I certainly appreciate your enthusiasm for Source-Navigator,
I don't think it is right for you to call this release "5.2.0". There is
no "official" 5.2.0 release yet. This mingw port has not had much
testing, so even calling it 5.2 alpha 1 is premature. Could you please
change the name of the download to something that made it clear
that this is not an official 5.2 release. How about something like:

snavigator-snapshot-2003.01.27-1.exe

thanks
Mo

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/