Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:30:11 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin Release process
Message-ID: <20030127213011.GB21752@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 0 DOT 20030127132032 DOT 031f91e0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 0 DOT 20030127151439 DOT 03d79008 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> <1043702100 DOT 963 DOT 39 DOT camel AT lifelesslap>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1043702100.963.39.camel@lifelesslap>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:15:01AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>Bill, IMO you are missing a key point:
>
>Cygwin is volunteer maintained. No release manager volunteer, and no
>stable release maintainer (who will maintain stable packages after they
>become stale) have stepped up.
>
>The *only* way you will get a stable release is to:
>1) offer to take on all the extra workload needed.
>2) ask (nicely :}) for disk space at sources.redhat.com to hold (1)
>possibly outdated copy of each package.
>3) patch setup.exe, or talk nicely to me :} to give it the functionality
>needed to support such an endeavour.
>
>I've spoken in favour of such an arrangement before, but didn't have the
>time or personal need to justify making it happen.
>
>Oh, and if a 'stable' cygwin became the most downloaded one, I'm sure
>you would get more assistance from the community - but trying to
>convince us to do it is pretty pointless: we are already contributing
>time and effort, and there has been plenty of opportunity for an extant
>maintainer to pipe up with "I'll do it".

I will provide space on sources.redhat.com, if someone is interested in
doing this.

For the record, I have no interest in changing anything.  DJ and I were
well aware of the fact that the Cygwin release process would be
different from Red Hat or Debian when we instituted the current policy.
I don't see anything particularly broken in the process now* so I'm not
going to be making any fixes.  However, I'll support someone with disk
space if they want to experiment with doing things differently.

cgf

*But I will, if pressed, offer many more opinions on this thread, so be
warned.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/