Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030127151439.03d79008@pop.nycap.rr.com> X-Sender: billlist AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:23:45 -0500 To: Max Bowsher , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "William A. Hoffman" Subject: Re: Cygwin Release process In-Reply-To: <009c01c2c63f$b1080f90$78d96f83@pomello> References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 0 DOT 20030127132032 DOT 031f91e0 AT pop DOT nycap DOT rr DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Well, if I am the only person with this opinion, then you are right. I should stop complaining and burn a CD. However, I suspect that I am not alone in wanting a more stable cygwin. It will be hard to prove my case, as the folks that read this list and post to it, tend to be more developer oriented, and are more interested in not missing out on the latest features than having a stable platform. There must be some reason that RedHat, Debian and all the major linux distributions have releases. I belive that if this were setup, and download stats were created, it would be come the most common type of download for cygwin. -Bill At 08:07 PM 1/27/2003 +0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >If this is not good enough for you, then *just burn a CD*. There is no need >to force this artificial 'release' policy on the Cygwin project. > > >Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/