Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:40:57 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: NTEA extensions for uid/gid Message-ID: <20030127094057.GJ2117@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20030124160019 DOT GO29236 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 05:19:47PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > This has nothing to do with each other. The mount -E flag doesn't > > influence the permission bits. > Then what is it supposed to do? I mean, if the man page says it makes It handles the way executables are recognized. There's a mechanism in Cygwin, trying to find out whether a file is exacutable or not, regardless of permission settings (e.g. on FAT filesystems). Having a .exe suffix is one of them. -X treats all files as executable, -E treats no file as executable. It speeds up processing of large /bin dirs etc. > Content-Description: getfacl output Looks as expected. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/