Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Shankar Unni Subject: Re: Bug in rm -r with locked files Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:39:08 -0800 Lines: 21 Message-ID: <3E2DBDFC.9050103@cotagesoft.com> References: <232810-220031221163510989 AT M2W098 DOT mail2web DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030121111136 DOT 0286aea0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <20030121201944 DOT GE17833 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Christopher Faylor wrote: > It's not a completely intractable problem. I think that someone (Chris > January?) provided a workaround at one point. "cygserver" could also > provide a possible solution someday. Right. I went back and re-read those archives. Interesting problem. Now why was it important to do this "delayed remove" semantics? I.e. what (as alluded to by Robert Collins) would be broken if unlink simply returned EPERM or something like that if the file was busy? I didn't see any reference to that in the message threads. (PS The archive search feature at http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/ seem to be broken - just about anything I type in the search box, including the word "cygwin", comes back with "no matches". So I apologize for not being able to do this research myself, and have to depend on those with long memories..) -- Shankar. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/