Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 23:48:39 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: linker can't find getsubopt()
Message-ID: <20030121044839.GA4841@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <988BE481ACC95C429DCB909F74A3163A05D686 AT exchange-il> <018401c2bfda$acc6a330$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030119173218 DOT GE22838 AT redhat DOT com> <01ce01c2bfe3$9ca9f2a0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030119194745 DOT GC23961 AT redhat DOT com> <015601c2c0c6$d6ddc170$78d96f83 AT pomello>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <015601c2c0c6$d6ddc170$78d96f83@pomello>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:59:35PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I don't think it is that simple.  Cygwin doesn't use the getopt that
>> comes with newlib.
>
>Ah. Just because I'm curious, why?
>
>> Is there supposed to be any correspondence between
>> the getopt version and the getsubopt version?
>
>I've just looked at newlib's getsubopt.c. It is completely independent of
>getopt, and in fact, has only been in newlib since 1.11.0.
>So, unless I've overlooked something, it *is* just a matter of
>cygwin.din/version.h.

Ok, then.  Thanks for checking.  Getting ready to gratefully accept a
patch.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/