Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <015601c2c0c6$d6ddc170$78d96f83@pomello>
From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <988BE481ACC95C429DCB909F74A3163A05D686 AT exchange-il> <018401c2bfda$acc6a330$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030119173218 DOT GE22838 AT redhat DOT com> <01ce01c2bfe3$9ca9f2a0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030119194745 DOT GC23961 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: linker can't find getsubopt()
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 20:59:35 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I don't think it is that simple.  Cygwin doesn't use the getopt that
> comes with newlib.

Ah. Just because I'm curious, why?

> Is there supposed to be any correspondence between
> the getopt version and the getsubopt version?

I've just looked at newlib's getsubopt.c. It is completely independent of
getopt, and in fact, has only been in newlib since 1.11.0.
So, unless I've overlooked something, it *is* just a matter of
cygwin.din/version.h.

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/