Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030119094345.01d88290@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 09:45:20 -0800 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: linker can't find getsubopt() In-Reply-To: <20030119173218.GE22838@redhat.com> References: <018401c2bfda$acc6a330$78d96f83 AT pomello> <988BE481ACC95C429DCB909F74A3163A05D686 AT exchange-il> <018401c2bfda$acc6a330$78d96f83 AT pomello> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 09:32 2003-01-19, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 04:49:04PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: > >It appears getsubopt is in newlib, and so present in Cygwin's > >, but not exported from cygwin1.dll > > > >One of Cygwin's core developers will need to tell us whether this is > >accidental or on purpose. > >Oh, it's on purpose. Believe me. Caused someone some discomfort? Then >our evil plan is succeeding. Core developers! Raise your glasses and >repeat after me "We are the core developers and we are MEAN!" > >It's a well know fact that we put functions in unistd.h which are not >actually exported by cygwin just to tantalize and confuse people. What >other earthly reason would we have for dangling this tempting fruit in >front of people, if not to frustrate them? > >Bwahahaha. > >cgf I'm on to you, Chaotica. Captain Proton -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/