Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 02:04:27 +0100 (CET) From: Fabio Alemagna To: Richard Henderson cc: Brian Ford , Nick Clifton , , , , Subject: Re: Support for DDWARF-2 debug info? (on Cygwin) In-Reply-To: <20030117232245.GD1898@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-scanner: scanned by Inflex 1.0.10 - (http://pldaniels.com/inflex/) Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:49:01PM +0100, Fabio Alemagna wrote: > > Wait a minute, are you saying IA-64 implements section-relative > > relocations? Is that for any kind of sections, or just the dwarf's ones? > > Any sections. See R_IA64_SECREL* in bfd/elfxx-ia64.c. Looking at that, at gas/config/tc-ia64.c and at an email in another thread here, I understand that SECREL relocations are triggered manually, by using a special gas construct, but for me that's overkill, because that should be the default behaviour, not a special one, so every relocation should be section-relative. How do I do that? Also, I guess I'd have to do it only when doing final linking, am I right? Fabio Alemagna -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/