Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Path: not-for-mail From: Charles Wilson Subject: Re: PATCH -u Re: BUG Report : automake on cygwin is acting up on --srcdir-name=. Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:40:48 -0500 Lines: 18 Message-ID: <3E284E30.8060001@ece.gatech.edu> References: <20030117154717 DOT 75856 DOT qmail AT web13310 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20030117154717.75856.qmail@web13310.mail.yahoo.com> /usr/bin/automake is a generated script. If you wish to submit a patch, download the source archive submit a patch against that (Note that each "final" script is built from fragments, where it takes two separate fragments to implement a new option). However, all I see in your patch is adding two new options "--build-dir" and "--srcdir-name". Why? What problem is the lack of these options causing? Which versions of automake (the real automake) introduced these options? Why are these options asymmetrical -- shouldn't you have "--srcdir-name and --builddir-name" or "--build-dir and --src-dir" (or is that a question more properly directed to the automake list?) Basically, regardless of the fact that I cannot use your patch in the source distribution for automake (wrappers), you haven't given me a reason to even try to add these new features. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/