Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:06:32 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: mkfifo implementation ?
Message-ID: <20030114150632.GD28687@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <GHEDJDAGJGMFPNAOIIBHKEDECAAA DOT gbourgeois AT yaccom DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <GHEDJDAGJGMFPNAOIIBHKEDECAAA.gbourgeois@yaccom.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:47:36AM +0100, gilles BOURGEOIS wrote:
>is mkfifo still not implemented (I read mailing list archive fron end of
>2003) , and I ran mkfifo which return -1 (and does not set errno) in my
>code.

mkfifo is not implemented and it *does* set errno to ENOSYS.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/