Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Fish" <fish AT infidels DOT org>
To: "Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Missed patch?  (gettimeofday time travels V2)
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:55:15 -0800
Message-ID: <000001c2bb91$824a13a0$0100a8c0@asswipe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Is there any reason why Philip Aston's 6 Jul 2002 patch to
gettimeofday et. al. logic to correct for WM_POWERBROADCAST events
(PBT_APMRESUMESUSPEND, PBT_APMRESUMEAUTOMATIC, PBT_APMRESUMECRITICAL)
hasn't made it into the sources yet?

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00962.html

Was this perhaps just a simple oversight? Or was there another reason
for it not being applied?

Thanks.

- -- 
"Fish" (David B. Trout)
   fish AT infidels DOT org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPiOmQUj11/TE7j4qEQIqVACg9exKrKE0ZMzmZavfzBzFkgBY/4UAn35W
JMjtv6fzDXQqQ8xQEXbG1kUq
=9Hmb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/