Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:10:25 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: GCC bug with strftime Message-ID: <20030114021025.GC19823@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 05:46:20PM -0800, Richard Troy wrote: >I recently discovered a bug in strftime(). I downloaded a very recent copy >of cygwin and tried again, but it's still there. So, I'd like to report >it. I sent mail to the gcc-bugs list but nobody there seems to care, Why *would* anyone in gcc care about a library problem? I believe that they actually mentioned that the below was a GNU extension. But, regardless, the problem has nothing to do with gcc. >The problem is that this call fails to return an hour: > > strftime(IT,key,"%m/%d/%y %l:%M %p", brokentime); > >The l% is supposed to represent a _space_ padded hour, as documented here: >http://www.gnu.org/manual/glibc-2.0.6/html_chapter/libc_17.html#SEC302 cygwin != glibc. However, since cygwin uses newlib, and the people in the newlib project are a cooperative bunch, maybe if you submitted a patch, they'd consider adding it. The mailing list is newlib at sources dot redhat dot com. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/