Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:34:59 -0500 From: Jason Tishler Subject: Re: inetutils ftpd fcntl(F_SETOWN) failure message suppression patch In-reply-to: <20030109182038.G21839@cygbert.vinschen.de> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-followup-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: <20030113143459.GE1012@tishler.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i References: <20030103133222 DOT GA1712 AT tishler DOT net> <20030107150428 DOT A14974 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20030109164436 DOT GA1064 AT tishler DOT net> <20030109164943 DOT GA3100 AT redhat DOT com> <20030109182038 DOT G21839 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Corinna, [I began to reply to this post on Friday, but I got distracted by attempting to port vsFTPd to Cygwin. This turned out to be a good use of my time. BTW, I never knew about vsFTPd. I wish I did about a month ago...] On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 06:20:38PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:49:43AM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:44:36AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > > >Would you be willing to to consider the following: > > > > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-10/msg00116.html > > > > > >Or, is it too esoteric for you? > > > > Judging by the description, that sounds more like a patch for the > > FSF inetutils maintainer than for the Cygwin inetutils maintainer. > > I agree. I agree too, but it was worth a shot because... > Oh btw... wouldn't you better like to maintain ProFTPd for Cygwin? > ;-) I would consider the above, if I could get Cygwin ProFTPd to work! I spent *way* too much time about a month or two ago attempting to get Cygwin ProFTPd to work. Unfortunately, I was not successful and put the port on the back burner. I will post my patch and findings if someone is interested or I get motivated. However, I was successful porting vsFTPd to Cygwin with some caveats. I will start a separate thread to discuss these issues. Please read this post since I could use some help with a mmap()/fork() problem... Thanks, Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/