Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:42:31 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: postinstall/profile.sh: pls consider testing for preexisting symbolic link Message-ID: <20030110174231.GB26102@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <200301101657 DOT h0AGv3c25610 AT tigris DOT pounder DOT sol DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200301101657.h0AGv3c25610@tigris.pounder.sol.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:57:03AM -0600, nicebounce AT trodman DOT com wrote: >-------- > >how about: > > if [ ! -f "/etc/profile" -a ! -L "/etc/profile"]; then > cp -a /etc/profile.default /etc/profile > fi > >Rightly or wrongly I setup /etc/profile as a symblic link to >a network drive version of profile, so that several hosts >share the same file. The postinstall/profile.sh leaves the >link but then copies in the default profile, so I have to manually >delete it. > >So, in general should there be a check for a symbolic link also >as shown above. > >Just a thought. It's a good thought, but, IMO, it probably should just be a '-e' check rather than a '-f' check. If someone wants to create a profile directory, they should be allowed to do that, too. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/