Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <200301092255.h09MtXi09586@crypt.compulink.co.uk>
X-Authentication-Warning: crypt.compulink.co.uk: hv owned process doing -bs
To: "linda w \(cyg\)" <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org>
cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, perl5-porters AT perl DOT org
Subject: Re: Repost, different list...File::Spec, cygwin, Syntactic vs. Semantic path analysis 
From: hv AT crypt DOT org
In-Reply-To: <006c01c2b82d$55dd70d0$1403a8c0@sc.tlinx.org> 
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 22:55:33 +0000

"linda w \(cyg\)" <cygwin AT tlinx DOT org> wrote:
:	What were the _original_ design goals of Cygwin -- i.e. as 
:sponsored by "RedHat"?

I do not think perl5-porters is the best place to be having that
discussion; perhaps it would be better served by a new thread
in the appropriate forum.

Thanks,

Hugo

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/