Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3E19CC2E.5000506@lapo.it> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:34:22 +0100 From: Lapo Luchini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030102 X-Accept-Language: it, en, fr, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gcj and -mno-cygwin References: <3E19B8FE DOT 304 AT decodon DOT com> <20030106173525 DOT GA27737 AT redhat DOT com> <3E19C176 DOT 4050009 AT decodon DOT com> In-Reply-To: <3E19C176.4050009@decodon.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.71.3.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Frank-Michael Moser wrote: > Are there plans to implement -mno-cygwin for gcj? cygwin and no-cygwin are quite different platform, gcj would need to be ported "twice" in pratice and, of course, cygwin is closer to original linux's gcj. Though I've just seen a "gcj release candidate" on http://www.mingw.org/ and AFAIK mingw is not-so-different from no-cygwin. They have different meanings but I guess/hope one day they'll converge. Anyway, as far as this ML is concerned, I think the reply to "there are plans?" is "no, but you can do them, if you want". ^_^ -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/