Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: Repost, different list...File::Spec, Cygwin, Syntactic vs. Semantic path analysis From: Robert Collins To: LA Walsh Cc: "'Hack Kampbjorn'" , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <000e01c2b569$4d0d0e50$1403a8c0@sc.tlinx.org> References: <000e01c2b569$4d0d0e50$1403a8c0 AT sc DOT tlinx DOT org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-VHma1dF5d3nwFyI8mQxd" Organization: Message-Id: <1041847729.19125.51.camel@lifelesslap> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: 06 Jan 2003 21:08:49 +1100 --=-VHma1dF5d3nwFyI8mQxd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 20:52, LA Walsh wrote: > Do you think this is proper behavior? Do you think a win32 person being > introduced to posix/gnu utils would find this beneficial? Do you think > a linux person who uses some combination of cygwin and Win utils would fi= nd > this beneficial? =20 Doctor, it hurts when I poke my eye.. Patient, don't do that. Cygwin is a layer, and if you want to violate that layer, expect somethings to need careful accomodation. If you want a win32 'normal' vim, download a win32 vim binary. Rob --=20 GPG key available at: . --=-VHma1dF5d3nwFyI8mQxd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+GVWxI5+kQ8LJcoIRAurLAJoDQsbKv42If46z+MwCWE3W3yybwwCbBCFp hkxLG9QDAY7GDZvw72hyEgw= =7Nwb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VHma1dF5d3nwFyI8mQxd--