Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 21:08:50 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: FAO: cfg: defaults Message-ID: <20030105020850.GE11814@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030104162127 DOT 0204c038 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030104162127 DOT 0204c038 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030104173837 DOT 01f6eda8 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030104173837.01f6eda8@pop3.cris.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:58:10PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: >Chris, > >I think it's in one of the email RFCs. I remember tracking it down once >during an (ill-considered) "debate" on one of the Bay Area Usenet groups. > >I should have made note of where I found it, but I didn't. I can find a >variety of non-official mentions of this as a recommended convention using >Google, but the relevant RFCs are numerous and voluminous. > >I'll try to find something definitive and authoritative and let you know. >(It's one of those pet peeve / crusade things for me to get people to use >these things, so the authority of the IETF is something good to have at >hand.) Thanks. I'm glad I asked. I probably should have implemented something for my email reader a while ago. This might spur me on to do that. Hmm. I guess I'm getting off-topic now. *Slap* cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/