Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3E11AE27.8070409@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 09:48:07 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Tishler CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: expect-20021218-1, gdb-20021218-1, tcltk-20021218-1 References: <20021219064238 DOT 488591C10B AT redhat DOT com> <3E039F0D DOT 2080100 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3E03A8BE DOT 2020602 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20021230152003 DOT GB1540 AT tishler DOT net> <20021230230202 DOT GC16336 AT redhat DOT com> <20021231142538 DOT GB1516 AT tishler DOT net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jason Tishler wrote: > I should have been more clear. I was reacting to the "cyg" not the lack > of a period. For example, in 8.0 we had libtcl80.a, in 8.3 now we have > libcygtk83.a. This name change is another reason why the above patch > needs to be reworked. > > >>I'm not really willing to arbitrarily change the convention now. > > > OK. I just wanted to check before I submitted my patch to the Python > patch collector. Since the config scripts (/usr/lib/tclConfig.sh, /usr/lib/tkConfig.sh) seem to be accurate now, is there any way you could use them to automatically grab the correct importlibs? It seems that using them is the Right Thing -- if they work. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/