Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: guile-1.5.6-5 mentioned in setup.ini References: <000701c2b0c3$df1805c0$6fc82486 AT medschool DOT dundee DOT ac DOT uk> Organization: Jan at Appel Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 14:59:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <000701c2b0c3$df1805c0$6fc82486@medschool.dundee.ac.uk> ('s message of "Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:58:02 -0000") Message-ID: <87d6nicmrc.fsf@peder.flower> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii writes: > In the current setup.ini (timestamp 1041225613) guile-1.5.6-5 is marked as > [prev] for all three of @guile, @guile-devel and @guile-doc. But it is > presumed [curr] as the source for @libguile14. *guile*-1.6.0-1 (is curr and) should be used for all purposes. > It seems odd to me but I can think of reasons why what might be [prev] for > one package might be [curr] for others. Please can the correct-ness of this > be confirmed by the maintainer? Sorry, and thanks. There's no reason, however, for the latest version of a versioned library package (libguile14-1.5.6-5 in this case) not to be curr. Old or custom packages (that possibly marked curr), may depend on it. Note that libguile12 is *newer* than libguile14 (see the guile-devel list). Greetings, Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/