Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20021228192446.01e81e10@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 19:27:59 -0800 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: rxvt, once again... In-Reply-To: <3E0E69AD.2000009@cotagesoft.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Hi, At 19:19 2002-12-28, Shankar Unni wrote: >Dockeen wrote: >>Hmmm, my results are pretty much the opposite. In Win2000, >>I can only resize the window in the vertical direction. In >>Win98SE I could only resize it very slightly, if at all. > >Argh. Let's put an end to this once and for all. > >In the NT-based series (WinNT4, Win2K, XP Pro), the command window has two >sets of parameters: the *screen buffer* size (width x height), and the >*window* size (what's actually displayed of the buffer). The command >window will put up an appropriate scrollbar if a buffer dimension is >larger than the corresponding window dimension. Isn't that what I said? >In these OSes, you can drag a window and resize it *up to the buffer >size*. Now, most of us typically set the buffer width and the window width >as the same (80 chars), so you can't resize horizontally, but we *can* >resize vertically if the buffer is larger than the window size (typically >24 lines). Isn't that what I said? >In Win98 and Me, you cannot drag and expand the window, or set a buffer >size larger than the window size. Period. Don't know if they have >deliberately crippled XP Home to match Me (I don't have XP Home to check..) > >-- >Shankar. Randall Schulz -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/