Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 14:39:19 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Bug somewhere between cygwin, gcc and cvs
Message-ID: <20021225193919.GA6905@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3E09F759 DOT 5040508 AT snet DOT net> <Mahogany-0 DOT 64 DOT 2-1786-20021225-104433 DOT 00 AT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <3E0A070D DOT 2020107 AT snet DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E0A070D.2020107@snet.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 02:29:17PM -0500, Arkadiy Belousov wrote:
>The version currently available does not support specifying port in
>CVSROOT.  And I need that for ssh tunneling.
>
>I do realize I am on the bleeding edge here.  Still, it's something to
>look at when CVS 1.11.2 is ported.  Personally, I think it's the
>compiler.  Let's wait till gcc loses (prerelease) label on it.

Despite appearances to the contrary, cygwin's gcc is based on the
released version of gcc 3.2.  There is no better version being planned.

It sounds to me like this is a problem with opening a directory using
open, as was previously suggested.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/