Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20021222193251.02837d18@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 19:56:04 -0800 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: what to use in g++ instead of GetOpt? In-Reply-To: References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20021221185540 DOT 027a74a8 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Howdy, Igor, Yes. I guess the oxymoron confused me, especially since I always program in the buff. Randy (why not?) At 19:12 2002-12-22, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >Umm, Randy, not to downplay the humor or the valid points in your >soliloquy, but he did say "well-dressed C++ programmers", and everybody >knows (tm) that Real Programmers aren't well-dressed (they also don't use >C++, it's for the wavering who can't decide between C and Java [to >paraphrase]). Of course, this also depends on your definition of >"well-dressed"... > Igor -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/