Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Dockeen" To: Subject: Re: What's wrong? gcc brain-damaged on cygwin? Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 09:59:08 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 "Could it be that when compiling and installing gcc with --enable-languages=c++ only gcc doesn't install some essential libs?" Why in the world are you creating your own gcc? I used to do it just because I wanted to use the gcc-3.1 code, but it is darn tricky and completely unneccessary now, as gcc comes pre-built in the devel directory. If there is something unique you want to do with a version of gcc, make a parallel build, don't build over Cygwin's gcc. When I was creating my own stuff, I was creating it as an additional compiler to the Cygwin compiler. I created it in a directory I called mygcc. And I believe, if memory served, when I compiled I had to do something like the following (I had aliased my new compiler to newg++): newg++ hello.cpp -L\mygcc\lib to make sure that the libstdc++ stuff got found. But again, I would not do a build of gcc now, certainly not one that replaces the Cygwin binaries. Wayne Keen -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/