Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Path: not-for-mail From: Charles Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH] exclude runtime-pseudo-reloc symbols from auto-export Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 11:16:01 -0500 Lines: 22 Message-ID: <3E0493C1.6040802@ece.gatech.edu> References: <3E03ECC8 DOT 5000605 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20021221043926 DOT GC18824 AT redhat DOT com> <1040456890 DOT 7654 DOT 1 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Cc: binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Robert Collins wrote: > On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 15:39, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >>Maybe the horse has left the barn already but it would have been nice >>(tm) if these type of symbols were marked in some generic way so that >>we wouldn't have to keep remembering to extend this table. > > > I recall commenting on this aspect in a recent binutils thread in the > cygwin lists, and being told that it didn't matter. > > Ha! > > Humourously yours, Quit yer laughin. I said at the time that yes, it is a pain -- but the alternatives are even worse. "Mark the symbols in some generic way" -- now THAT's fragile. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/