Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:55:01 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Gcc 3.2 -mno-cygwin
Message-ID: <20021220045501.GA2504@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <3DFE40AD DOT 8497 DOT 1830AAB AT localhost> <3E02296C DOT 13888 DOT 18BCFF7 AT localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E02296C.13888.18BCFF7@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:17:48PM -0800, Paul G. wrote:
>...for as long as -mno-cygwin switch, or use thereof, is not being
>deprecated...if, however, -mno-cygwin is being deprecated or the use
>thereof is being "officially" deprecated, then what's the point in
>talking about it in the first place?

-mno-cygwin is not deprecated.  It has never been deprecated and it is
not going to be deprecated.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/