Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:50:47 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: building the gcc-3.2-3 bootstrap fails on libstdc++-v3 Message-ID: <20021216155047.GA4355@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20021216112627 DOT 63464 DOT qmail AT web13303 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021216112627.63464.qmail@web13303.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 03:26:27AM -0800, James Michael DuPont wrote: >As promised, I have started to check the releases >of cygwin by bootstrapping them. >This one got pretty far, all the way to libstdc++-v3. > >The error is : >../../../../include/getopt.h:115: declaration of C function `int >getopt()' > conflicts with >/usr/include/sys/unistd.h:125: previous declaration `int getopt(int, >char* const*, const char*)' here In case it isn't clear, I *do not care* about this problem. I am able to build gcc myself with no problem. I *don't care* if it doesn't work for you since the fix is so completely trivial. If you want to suggest a fix that goes beyond making the obvious change to ../include/getopt.h, then send it to the gcc mailing list. Otherwise, these reports are just noise here. You've got a functional gcc compiler use it. If you want to build it yourself, then fix the source and move on. How many times do I have to say this??? cgf >Please note that the make boostrap does not work with gcc 3.2-3 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/