Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" To: Subject: RE: pipe improvements in snapshot Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:08:17 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal In-Reply-To: <000b01c2a169$672f8240$659ac250@leper> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal > W98/SE. With the current cygwin1.dll I tried > time cat | nice -0 dd of=/dev/null > time cat | nice --1 dd of=/dev/null > where hugefile ~ 100MB, and got times roughly 1m20s with the 2nd instruction > marginally faster. Then switched to the snapshot cygwin1-20021210.dll and > shaved a minute yes a minute off the times. Then tried creating new files as > in > time cat | nice -0 dd of=hugefile2 > time cat | nice --1 dd of=hugefile3 > (this took about 30s each) and checked md5sums. Not a byte out of place. > Fergus > P.S. Thanks to thomas for these good diagnostic scripts. > OH. MY. GOD. If I understand the problem and solution (which I marginally do), and Win9x vs. WinNT/XP (which nobody really does), this ***~2.66x*** speedup should be even greater on NT/XP. I'm giddy with anticipation over what this might do to configure times etc. This may be the coolest thing since sliced time. -- Gary R. Van Sickle Brewer. Patriot. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/