Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 17:07:58 -0800 From: "Joseph I. Davida" Subject: Re: Latest setup.exe To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: <3DF149EE.59580E55@pacbell.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en References: <3DEF7161 DOT 6683D113 AT pacbell DOT net> <00fe01c29c7e$416d2700$78d96f83 AT pomello> <3DF127B1 DOT B9B5DF0E AT pacbell DOT net> <00bb01c29d84$9b0b5410$78d96f83 AT pomello> I tried the beta version Max suggested and it also exhibits the same behaviour on my win2k laptop; i.e. sucks up huge mem (depletes VM), and yet after more than 1 hour of running, it still says 1% of base-files 1.1-1 is installed. The "total" progress meter shows only about a sliver of "progress" :) Am running win2K with latest updates (service pack 3). Also, I have been updating my cygwin installation for over a year now, and this is the first time I have encountered this problem. Joe Max Bowsher wrote: > > Please keep replies on list! > > Joseph I. Davida wrote: > > > It appears that this setup.exe is depleting the VM pool. > > There is either a bad memory leak problem, or there > > is a boundless recursion in the calls. I suspect the > > it is a memory leak problem. > > The machine has 512M sdram and a 40 gig HD, of which > > a max of 2048M is used for paging. Yet the setup.exe > > alone eats up all the VM pool!. > > > > Is there an older version of it that I can try? > > Try the latest beta at http://cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/ > > Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/