Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [FAQ?] Re: [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ? From: Robert Collins To: Charles Wilson Cc: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" In-Reply-To: <3DEFEAA3.30906@ece.gatech.edu> References: <103912682 9 DOT 13185 DOT 121 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3DEFE1AD DOT 1000707 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <1039131723 DOT 13185 DOT 130 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <3DEFEAA3 DOT 30906 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jZUu4DApqO4wKW87+dGO" Date: 06 Dec 2002 12:33:13 +1100 Message-Id: <1039138394.13185.134.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-jZUu4DApqO4wKW87+dGO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 11:09, Charles Wilson wrote: > Sortof. I assumed a priori that a 557MB tarball is a bad idea.=20 Yep. And the original poster, was asserting that such a tarball is a good idea. Thus my figures to show that it ain't - for the common case. > I was not, in any way, suggesting that setup learn how to parse a cygwin=20 > "installation" created by some moron unzipping a bunch of tarballs by=20 > hand. No way. Never. Whew :}. I didn't think *you* would suggest such a thing. I was more worried about having the last word, so that the archives will show it to be a bad thing :}. Rob --=20 --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. --- --=-jZUu4DApqO4wKW87+dGO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA97/5ZI5+kQ8LJcoIRAkXSAKCdup6hGiFLJ9LFwjl4X+ax/d1U6QCdGKSi UfHXWW4RSb/PvrWXSQY56fQ= =3DKW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jZUu4DApqO4wKW87+dGO--