Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:58:38 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: strtof is missing Message-ID: <20021205145838.GD16892@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com References: <200211240004 DOT 04863 DOT jblazi AT gmx DOT de> <177909597 DOT 20021124103437 AT vtc DOT ru> <20021124105015 DOT X1398 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3DEE5BD8 DOT 5000408 AT redhat DOT com> <20021205103407 DOT N1140 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <1039081042 DOT 13185 DOT 84 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1039081042.13185.84.camel@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:37:22PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 20:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>Removing the symbol might break these applications (though I assume >>there aren't that much apps using strtodf). > >We can just export it twice from cygwin.din. That + Jeff's patch will >keep backwards compatability and provide the right API for new apps. Yes, I think this is the best approach. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/