Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3DE8E77D.3000603@lapo.it> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:29:49 +0100 From: Lapo Luchini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021122 X-Accept-Language: it, en, fr, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mailing List: CygWin Subject: Re: cygwin's autoconf? References: <3DE8CDE5 DOT 8060307 AT lapo DOT it> <012101c2987f$67c9eb70$78d96f83 AT pomello> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > >I believe that autoreconf isn't entirely reliable. > >This is the reason that projects (e.g. libgetopt++) often have a >bootstrap.sh which runs the relevant autotools. > Doing "aclocal && automake && autoconf" as the autobook suggests doesn't change things... =( (or: it does seldom work, but usually doesn't.. that's why I'm thinking about granularity in NT's timekeeping) -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available) http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/