Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021129105149.02adadd0@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:00:53 -0800
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject: Re: Samba Client compilation on the latest DLL
In-Reply-To: <33379.192.168.2.98.1038595760.squirrel@81.6.209.102>
References: <20021129170601 DOT A1040 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <2628 DOT 193 DOT 132 DOT 197 DOT 91 DOT 1038574382 DOT squirrel AT mail DOT iseekuk DOT com>
 <20021129135651 DOT D1398 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <4807 DOT 193 DOT 132 DOT 197 DOT 91 DOT 1038574716 DOT squirrel AT mail DOT iseekuk DOT com>
 <20021129170601 DOT A1040 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Lee,

Surely all but the most inexperienced programmers using C or C++ know that 
a program that executes without overt failure cannot be considered 
bug-free? That a perfectly valid change in the compiler, the linker, the 
libraries or a switch to a different platform (which usually means all of 
these change) can make formerly latent bugs become manifest, right?

Considering that your program is not able to get off the ground, as it 
were, then you may have an unholy combination of libraries, run-times or 
compiler options. Complex software with big configuration scripts and large 
(and / or multiple) makefiles can sometimes cause such unsound mixtures.

It's also possible that there is some corruption in a library with which 
you're linking. If this is so and unless it's a fairly subtle corruption it 
might be visible in the debugger by viewing the assembly code at or near 
the point of failure.


By the way, I'm certainly not offended, but I take it you were. That was 
not my intent. I'm sorry.

Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 10:49 2002-11-29, Lee Packham wrote:
>Then, I start to wonder why smbclient fails on a line where the example I 
>give, fails.
>
>/me goes back to drawing board.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/