Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:38:46 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Samba Client compilation on the latest DLL Message-ID: <20021129173846.GA22545@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <2628 DOT 193 DOT 132 DOT 197 DOT 91 DOT 1038574382 DOT squirrel AT mail DOT iseekuk DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021129081339 DOT 02755ec0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20021129081339.02755ec0@pop3.cris.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 08:15:57AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote: >Have you checked to verify that all the declarations of the suspect global >data are consistent with its definition? Yes. What Randall is effectively saying is that contrary to popular opinion on the cygwin mailing list, every segv is not a cygwin problem. You should exercise standard programming practice and *debug* your program before blaming the problem on cygwin. Expecting that someone will have a magical solution to a simple SEGV is asking a lot. It should be really really obvious that something as simple as the code snippet posted is going to work without problem. If it didn't then the mailing list would be filled with complaints. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/