Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 18:42:35 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Using -mno-cygwin
Message-ID: <20021128234235.GB6179@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 6 DOT 0 DOT 20021129094805 DOT 00a1f6a0 AT mail DOT ozemail DOT com DOT au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20021129094805.00a1f6a0@mail.ozemail.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 09:48:37AM +1100, Warren Dale wrote:
>QUESTION 1: Should "long long" be fully supported in mingw32?
>        It seems that the compiler and the library do not agree.
>
>
>QUESTION 2: Should "snprintf()" be fully supported in mingw32?
>        It seems that the compiler and the library do not agree.

The Mingw32 mailing list is

mingw-users at lists dot sourceforge dot net.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/