Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:35:46 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: How can I avoid using a DOS box?? Message-ID: <20021127153546.GE6924@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1038398679 DOT 16091 DOT 23 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1038398679.16091.23.camel@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:04:38PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: >On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 19:10, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: >>Are things to the point where we could make rxvt the default installed >>terminal emulator instead of the DOS box? I can't imagine any Win9x >>user could possibly complain, and any NT+ user that would is simply >>misguided ;-). > >Well, it's been discussed before IIRC. Certainly I'm in favour of it. I don't know how often I've expressed my opinion but I am mildly against it. The problem is that cygwin's pty implementation is not perfect. It can't run some native windows programs and it can deadlock occasionally. There are some patches available that potentially solve the deadlock issue but they need more testing. Anyway, I'm concerned that defaulting to rxvt will just shuffle the bug reports from "How do I get scroll bars?" to "Why doesn't my XYZ software work right on CygWIN?" cgf -- Please do not send me personal email with cygwin questions or observations. Use the resources at http://cygwin.com/ . -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/