Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: compressing cygcheck output considered harmful? From: Robert Collins To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20021127022327.GA27364@redhat.com> References: <20021127022327 DOT GA27364 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-83zqYWT4A5rMylZixfvE" Date: 27 Nov 2002 12:29:12 +1100 Message-Id: <1038360552.23476.472.camel@lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 --=-83zqYWT4A5rMylZixfvE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:23, Christopher Faylor wrote: >=20 > Does it make sense not to send cygcheck output in compressed format? Yes. Rob --=20 --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. --- --=-83zqYWT4A5rMylZixfvE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA95B/oI5+kQ8LJcoIRAmmQAKC7T5LvLMeXiirComrz1n7u+twUswCgmqrm Jdwq57ASRqyp0CttjujuxuY= =pV7z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-83zqYWT4A5rMylZixfvE--