Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: compressing cygcheck output considered harmful?
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20021127022327.GA27364@redhat.com>
References: <20021127022327 DOT GA27364 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-83zqYWT4A5rMylZixfvE"
Date: 27 Nov 2002 12:29:12 +1100
Message-Id: <1038360552.23476.472.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-83zqYWT4A5rMylZixfvE
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:23, Christopher Faylor wrote:

>=20
> Does it make sense not to send cygcheck output in compressed format?

Yes.

Rob

--=20
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---

--=-83zqYWT4A5rMylZixfvE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA95B/oI5+kQ8LJcoIRAmmQAKC7T5LvLMeXiirComrz1n7u+twUswCgmqrm
Jdwq57ASRqyp0CttjujuxuY=
=pV7z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-83zqYWT4A5rMylZixfvE--