Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: New setup.exe beta.
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <87vg2k2dai.fsf@peder.flower>
References: <1038310403 DOT 23988 DOT 415 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> 
	<87vg2k2dai DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-fWbNFQkezkLvNp7qfxgY"
Date: 27 Nov 2002 08:32:00 +1100
Message-Id: <1038346320.23988.462.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-fWbNFQkezkLvNp7qfxgY
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 09:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com> writes:


> Has the timestamp definition changed?

No, but the entry to the packages area has, your trailing linefeed is
the likely culprit.

I had some hairy stuff happening at one point, and the unlimited \n in
the prelude got lost. I'll do some testing and see if I can reinstate it
safely.

Rob
--=20
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---

--=-fWbNFQkezkLvNp7qfxgY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA94+hQI5+kQ8LJcoIRAmnbAJ4oFZJW9NbpQBiy2wcztvAhyh/2lACbB5nN
JqEoILTBT0yR5zWHYBqwvDA=
=wggN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-fWbNFQkezkLvNp7qfxgY--