Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Missing getopt.h for MinGW is not a bug.
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <3DE36FE5.60504@yahoo.com>
References: <3DE36FE5 DOT 60504 AT yahoo DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-X7YhppRBE4DGgzoXDYjr"
Date: 26 Nov 2002 23:13:37 +1100
Message-Id: <1038312819.23476.417.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-X7YhppRBE4DGgzoXDYjr
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 23:58, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> We purposefully do not give GPLed interfaces to the MinGW user=20
> community, even though we do supply the libraries for those who are=20
> aware of the GPL issues.  You'll have to supply your own declarations=20
> for getopt.

There are BSD getopt's floating around, why not use one of those?

If I'm putting my nose in a can of worms, just say so :}.

Rob
--=20
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---

--=-X7YhppRBE4DGgzoXDYjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA942VxI5+kQ8LJcoIRAsCoAKCJMwFH8OXVMc4LbGVM7T8fzshplQCbB42D
Pm2uypBY+zM3CCqIMcdwmJU=
=Ujp1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-X7YhppRBE4DGgzoXDYjr--