Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Ralf Habacker" To: , Subject: RE: [Patch] skipping import libraries for performance reasons - direct auto-import of dll's Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:30:01 +0100 Message-ID: <015101c2951d$a17fe960$cd6407d5@BRAMSCHE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal In-reply-to: <20021126013800.GA14011@redhat.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:46:50PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: > >3. ld works more like the linux version. There are only static archives and > >shared libraries which could be linked directly without the > indirection of using > >import libraries. This simplifies for example libtool handling. > > I don't see how. If anything it would complicate libtool handling > since libtool > would have to know about both import libraries and dlls. You can't just give > up on import libraries, if for no other reason than some libraries (like > cygwin's for instance) contain a combination of import data and static data. This and perhaps other libraries may be an exception, but couldn't this splitted like linux does ? If I remember right, they uses a standard lib like glibc, which may be a shared lib and some kind of startupcode in an objectfile (static), which may be different for executable or dll's or other kinds of output. Why does cygwin uses a specific way ? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/