Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <3DDEC952.3010308@equator.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:18:26 -0800 From: Nitin Gupta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vijay Sampath CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: -DDATE start giving error with gcc-3.2.3 References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Yeah, I will change the code. My idea was that some one will see the difference in preprocessed file using gcc -E -dD foo.c -DDATE="Wed Nov" Vijay Sampath wrote: > This isn't the original program you posted to the list. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nitin Gupta [mailto:gupta AT equator DOT com] > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:13 PM > To: Vijay Sampath > Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: -DDATE start giving error with gcc-3.2.3 > > Try on latest cygwin. > gcc-2.exe foo.c -DDATE="Wed Nov" > (gcc-2 is gcc 2.95) > and > gcc.exe foo.c -DDATE="Wed Nov" > (gcc is gcc 3.2) > > where foo.c is > >#include >#include > >main(){ > >printf ("Hello World!\n"); >} > > > > > > Vijay Sampath wrote: > >>I'll be very surprised if your program compiles under any C compiler on >>Earth. >> >>-Vijay >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Nitin Gupta [mailto:gupta AT equator DOT com] >>>Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:23 PM >>>To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >>>Subject: -DDATE start giving error with gcc-3.2.3 >>> >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>If I compiled following code with -DDATE="Wed Nov 22", it >>>compiled fine >>>using gcc-2.95, but when I updated my cygwin recently, it gives parse >>>errors using gcc-3.2.3 (which, I think it should) >>> >>>#include >>>#include >>>typedef double DATE; >>>main(){ >>> >>>printf ("Hello World!\n"); >>>} >>> >>>Looks like wtypes.h also has DATE defined. But, it should >>>have given me >>>error earlier also, as wtypes had this definition earlier also. >>> >>>Was this a gcc bug that got fixed in gcc-3.2.3? or is there >>>anything else >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Nitin >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >>>Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html >>>Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >>>FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/