Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:00:07 +0100 From: thomas Reply-To: thomas X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <7825298296.20021122000007@huno.net> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: old cygwin distributions In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20021121143225.02ac95f0@pop3.cris.com> References: <022101c291aa$97665890$78d96f83 AT pomello> <7916445640 DOT 20021121213235 AT huno DOT net> <01c901c291a1$476f16a0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <1119233000 DOT 20021121221902 AT huno DOT net> <022101c291aa$97665890$78d96f83 AT pomello> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20021121143225 DOT 02ac95f0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Randall R Schulz wrote: > This is especially true since you're using software that has no Cygwin > maintainer. Have you consulted with the development team for "cdrecord?" cdrecord is contributed, so i guess that counts as 1/4 officialy supported :) i did contact the developer of cdrecord, jörg schilling, and as mentioned in my first post he thinks this is a cygwin scheduling bug. in fact he asked me to make a bug report to the mailing list. i'm not really familiar with gdb and strace but i'll give it a whirl and report back. thomas -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/