Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021120104601.02de6cc8@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 10:51:18 -0800 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: .rhosts on W2K w/o ntsec In-Reply-To: <3DDBD796.6050004@csgsystems.com> References: <3DDAB456 DOT 4000303 AT csgsystems DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Christian, Use "cygstart docFile" instead of "cmd /c docFile" Cygstart doesn't require the execute bit on the document file as "cmd /c" does. I don't know how cygstart works internally, but I imagine it looks up the association and launches the appropriate application without regard for the execute bits on the document file being opened. Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA At 10:42 2002-11-20, Christian Mueller wrote: >>... > >I just did some tests with CYGWIN=ntsec and it seems as if it's better >than it used to be a year ago or so. The only thing that doesn't work is >typing something like "cmd /c xxx.doc" to start the according application >automatically if the according file is not executable but I can write a >little script that looks into /proc/registry and figures out how to open a >file of a given type. > >I'll give it a shot, convert all my files to NT security and see how it >goes. Thanks again. > >Cheers, >--Christian -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/