Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:51:29 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: SSHD: error initializing windows sockets if I use ".ssh/authorized_keys"
Message-ID: <20021120125129.I24928@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20021116174458 DOT A10374 AT ping DOT be> <3DD67E8F DOT 25627B1D AT isg DOT de> <3DDB655E DOT 6070004 AT isg DOT de> <20021120114903 DOT F24928 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3DDB6E33 DOT 3030305 AT isg DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3DDB6E33.3030305@isg.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:12:51PM +0100, Tino Lange wrote:
> The only point that is left is the cygcheck.out - did you mean that?

Yes.

> OK - why didn't I include a "cygcheck.out"?
> 
> a) maybe the information was already enough for you to locate the problem

No.

> b) "cygwin AT cogwin DOT com" is a huge list - I don't want to spam lots of 
> people with this information - if someone needs it I can send it to him 
> personally I don't like to recieve lot's of cygcheck.out a day as a 
> public reader of this list myself.

It's one (better: the) purpose of the cygwin ML to send bug reports here
and to receive help if somebody actually knows a solution.

> c) cygcheck.out can contain *lots* of personal information. I don't want 
> Microsoft to spy on my computer why should I broadcast such information 
> by myself actively on a mailinglist that's very huge, get's archived and 
> so on?????

Then obfuscate stuff in the cygcheck output which you take for private.

> I have no Problem sending this file to you, Corinna, or some of your 

Perhaps, but *I* have problems with getting PM about Cygwin stuff.
Did you read the section "Shouldn't I just send email to straight to a
cygwin developer or package maintainer?", especially the "Reply-To:"
passage?

> You just got it with separate mail.

No, I didn't so far and I don't want to get PM further on.  This is the
reason I'm setting the Reply-To: to the ML and not using my real mail
address.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/