Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021119074303.0276a4d0@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:45:09 -0800 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: ls problem In-Reply-To: <003b01c29030$464e9420$437517d2@astra03> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Carlo, I think your next step must be to run "ls" under "strace" and see where the excess time (presumably idle time) is going. Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA At 17:00 2002-11-19, Carlo Florendo wrote: >Hi Igor, > >I tried disabling ntsec and "ls -l" is still slow. I'm using >1.3.15-cygwin-1-3-15-1. "ls -l" and "ls -ln" takes almost the same amount >of time. On a directory with 3 short text files, the difference, when I >timed "ls -l" and "ls -b", is still considerable. > >fcarlo AT ZEUS~ >$ time ls -b >a b test > >real 0m0.024s >user 0m0.030s >sys 0m0.015s > >fcarlo AT ZEUS ~ >$ time ls -l >total 11 >-rw-r--r-- 1 fcarlo None 5 Nov 19 13:58 a >-rw-r--r-- 1 fcarlo None 5 Nov 19 13:58 b >-rw-r--r-- 1 fcarlo None 8283 Nov 19 13:59 test > >real 0m1.819s >user 0m0.030s >sys 0m0.000s > >Best Regards, > >Carlo Florendo -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/