Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: libxml2/libxslt binaries: libxml2 version mismatch in xsltproc
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: Yves Forkl <Yves DOT Forkl AT gmx DOT net>
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <3DD8BEB3.9658A7A6@gmx.net>
References: <3DD8BEB3 DOT 9658A7A6 AT gmx DOT net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-TYvPy2LaSqIxDV608bFe"
Date: 19 Nov 2002 22:42:18 +1100
Message-Id: <1037706140.25560.36.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0

--=-TYvPy2LaSqIxDV608bFe
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 21:19, Yves Forkl wrote:

>=20
> Sorry for not being clear about the specific problem I encountered which
> is almost certainly caused by the version mismatch, but I didn't know if
> that classified as a bug proper - please see the description of the
> problem in the message included.

Well, for future reference, unclear messages get a 'clarify or go away'
response 100% of the time.


> > $ xsltproc --version
> > Using libxml 20417, libxslt 10010 and libexslt 703
> > xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20413, libxslt 10010 and libexslt
> > 703
> > libxslt 10010 was compiled against libxml 20413
> > libexslt 703 was compiled against libxml 20413
>=20
>   Looks 1/ old 2/ bad (the library used an the one the application was
> compiled again do not match)
...
>   Simply upgrade then !

I need time to do a new build , a new libxml and libxslt have just been
released anyway. For now, you can build your own, using the patches in
the cygwin source packages as a starting point.

I suspect this is an age thing, not a version mismatch BTW.

Rob


>=20
--=20
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---

--=-TYvPy2LaSqIxDV608bFe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA92iOaI5+kQ8LJcoIRAiapAJ9wgOb6UARijMKdVEYU8kOOZV/jIgCgzNpa
t+Vt+P2KgVW2JjDrFgSwdGM=
=lC2N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-TYvPy2LaSqIxDV608bFe--