Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:26:17 -0500 From: Jason Tishler Subject: Re: Postgresql installation problems. In-reply-to: <20021119014041.A19795@ping.be> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-followup-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-id: <20021119122617.GC1296@tishler.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i References: <20021116174458 DOT A10374 AT ping DOT be> <20021118204947 DOT GI472 AT tishler DOT net> <20021119014041 DOT A19795 AT ping DOT be> Kurt, On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:40:41AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 03:49:47PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > > Any XP users successfully running PostgreSQL? If so, please post > > your experiences to the list. I'm especially interested in XP Home, > > since I assume that XP Pro will be the same as NT/2000. > > I'm using XP Pro. Hmm...I assumed XP Pro would be the same as NT/2000. I guess it is time to debug why ipc-daemon is not working for you under XP Pro. > It seems it should just give a error instead of using all CPU. Yes. > Anything else changed? Nothing on the PostgreSQL side. However, it is built against cygipc 1.13-2 instead of 1.11-1. See the cygipc ChangeLog for the details. > I tried about everything I could think of. You may want to try the pgsql-cygwin AT postgresql DOT org mailing list. IIRC, there are users there using XP. Jason -- PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/